Not exaggerating anything. Just pointing out how weak the initial case was, which apparently is grounds for a libel action. I see you're now developing it from OMG ALCOHOL NO OMG!!! which is to be welcomed. I never knew there were so many puritans in Forest Hill. Had you waited a little while and actually put some thought into it, you might not have needed to hang your objections on something that always smacked of being deeply insincere. I still think the deliveries argument is highly speculative, and that you should base any objections to it on what Morrisons actually say, rather than 'well, some bloke on the forum says they'll need a lorry there two or three times a day, backing into the next street, and there's no way they'll park outside the gym, no.'