SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002  -  10,000+ members

Home | SE23 Topics | Local Businesses | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | Site Feedback | Advertising | Contact
Geddes Hairdressing & Barbering Studio One Armstrong & Co Solicitors


Post Reply  Post Topic 
Planning Application - Next to Baxter's Field
Author Message
michael


Posts: 3,205
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #1
08-03-2011 02:23 PM

An application for 6 new family houses on a backland site on Radlett Avenue:

http://acolnet.lewisham.gov.uk/LEWIS-XSL...mkey=62511

I would be interest in views of people who live close to the site either on the forum or by PM.

Find all posts by this user Reply
152047


Posts: 129
Joined: Jan 2011
Post: #2
08-03-2011 02:59 PM

Another grim garden grabbing attack on Forest Hill's green and pleasant land. The proposed development looks cramped, uninspired and without merit. On that basis Lewisham's planners are bound to recommend approval. Anyway isn't this the bungalow that had an award winning tropical garden a few years ago?

Find all posts by this user Reply
robin orton


Posts: 716
Joined: Feb 2009
Post: #3
08-03-2011 04:56 PM

This seems likely to result in significant extra road traffic in a road which is at present quiet and child-, dog-, cat-, fox- and pedestrian-friendly. The road is much used by children from the local primary schools (Eliot Bank, Holy Trinity, Kelvin Grove) on their way to and from Baxter Fields, where there is a children's playground.

Find all posts by this user Reply
DerbyHillTop


Posts: 120
Joined: Aug 2008
Post: #4
08-03-2011 05:35 PM

Overcrowding was my first thought, until I looked deeper into the measurements. In the end this is one of better development proposals. For start they are all family homes and I like the practical layouts. I would object if the proposal was for a block of flats full of one / two bed units.

With so many schools and park near by it is a perfect place for few more families. And with amenities so close, traffic increase by these families would be negligible. I would expect it would be easier to walk to schools than try to park up the road in the school run.

Find all posts by this user Reply
borderpaul


Posts: 87
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #5
08-03-2011 10:10 PM

I had a quick look and it does look like a high standard development.

The one thing I don't like is that it is a gated development which I feel does not fit in with the existing street or surrounding area.

A gated development will also cause greater traffic problems as cars queue to enter with visitors and tradesmen having to park outside on the street.

Find all posts by this user Reply
robin orton


Posts: 716
Joined: Feb 2009
Post: #6
16-03-2011 10:21 AM

Michael, I have sent you a PM. A number of local residents are objecting to this development.

Find all posts by this user Reply
IWereAbsolutelyFuming


Posts: 531
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #7
16-03-2011 11:05 AM

The obvious first impression is that they are trying to cram too much in but having looked in detail at the application I'm surprised to say I'm erring on being supportive.

Not sure the 'gated' element is really an issue. It is already gated for a start and the idea of a queue of traffic attempting to enter the site at the same time doesn't seem likely. The position of the gate would seem to allow for at least two cars to be off the main carriageway if such a situation did occur or if deliveries etc were being made.

I also like the idea of a group of family homes tucked away safely near a local park and schools. I live in a cul-de-sac of similar sized properties with similar sized gardens. One of the things that is valued by many of the residents is the quiet shared space to the front of the houses where kids are relatively safe to play, under supervision. It looks like this development would provide a similar amenity.

The size of the units seems to closely mirror a set of 6 houses on the opposite side of Baxter's Field but I can see why local residents are nervous or objecting to an increase from 1 to 6 houses on the plot. That said, if it was cut to 4 or 3 houses I imagine the level of objection would be much the same.

When a house in our street went up for sale recently there was plenty of interest despite the state of the property market, presumably as it represented an affordable family home.

Find all posts by this user Reply
sarah


Posts: 1
Joined: Mar 2011
Post: #8
21-03-2011 07:12 PM

it's all very well that cars may be 'queueing' off the street to get through the gate, but no.12, the house next door to the proposed development has a street-level window against the border which will be directly looked into by those queueing cars, which is a massive privacy issue. there are also 2 further upstairs windows on this wall

Find all posts by this user Reply
IWereAbsolutelyFuming


Posts: 531
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #9
22-03-2011 10:44 AM

Come on, do we really believe there are going to be significant periods where vehicles queue to enter the plot? Are the upstairs windows at risk from queuing double decker buses waiting to get into the plot?

There may be grounds for objection with this proposal but not queuing traffic!

Find all posts by this user Reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Possibly Related Topics ...
Topic: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Planning application to convert Home Accessories Extra to a coffee shop hillview 8 3,624 22-04-2018 01:35 PM
Last Post: hillview
  Planning application to convert Forest Hill Co-op to a hotel hillview 12 3,950 10-03-2018 02:34 PM
Last Post: Uhuru
  Planning application to change Honor Oak Supermarket to a bar nitoda 10 9,695 03-07-2016 08:42 PM
Last Post: HannahD
  Planning Application: 1 Manor Mount Mrjamon 50 28,431 14-12-2015 11:46 AM
Last Post: Londondrz
  The 4 Redberry Grove Planning Application robertlondon 21 16,395 15-09-2015 07:16 AM
Last Post: JRW
  Planning Application: M&Co to become a Morrisons Local? edpaff 141 80,612 09-09-2015 04:42 PM
Last Post: michael
  Planning Application: 51-53 Canonbie Road penfold 88 68,096 02-05-2014 02:04 PM
Last Post: Hunter
  Planning Application - Hindsley Place and Westbourne Drive michael 124 70,714 09-01-2014 01:46 PM
Last Post: Perryman
  Planning Application: 120 Stanstead Road michael 67 42,986 11-12-2013 03:50 PM
Last Post: Mr_Numbers
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise ForestGump 58 38,696 02-04-2013 05:53 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise NewForester 30 24,219 02-08-2012 05:00 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: Land to the rear of 107 Honor Oak Park alethius 5 5,179 25-06-2012 12:02 PM
Last Post: alethius
  Planning Application: 27 Shipman Road theirpuppet 50 30,983 07-06-2012 10:25 AM
Last Post: emma
  Codrington Hill - planning application? blushingsnail 1 3,211 24-05-2012 11:02 PM
Last Post: megan
  Planning Application - 113 Bovill Road davidl 7 6,582 21-04-2012 12:06 PM
Last Post: HOPcat
  Planning application: 33 Dartmouth Road Baboonery 16 8,755 29-11-2011 10:41 AM
Last Post: IWereAbsolutelyFuming
  Planning Application: 15 Davids Road NewForester 4 4,024 18-08-2011 08:34 AM
Last Post: notstoppin
  Planning Application: 139 Sunderland Road RobF 48 27,320 04-06-2011 10:00 PM
Last Post: michael
  Planning Application: 35 Sunderland Road celticexplorer 31 19,334 17-12-2010 01:00 PM
Last Post: NewForester
  Campaign against planning application at 4-10 Aylward Road Stephanie 0 2,196 11-05-2010 05:32 PM
Last Post: Stephanie