1) The development, by reason of the poorly situated car parking areas and failure to provide 100% properties to lifetime home standards, would represent a poor standard of residential accommodation to the detriment of future occupants, contrary to policy 3A.5 of the London Plan February 2008 and policies HSG 5 Layout and Design of New Residential Development and URB 4 Designing Out Crime of the Councils adopted Unitary Development Plan (July 2004).
2) The development, by reason of its layout, height, design, as well as loss of trees, which screen the development from its surroundings, would fail to complement or be compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding environment, resulting in an un-neighbourly form of development, contrary to policies URB 3 Urban Design, HSG 5 Layout and Design of New Residential Development and HSG 8 Backland and Infill Development of the Councils adopted Unitary Development Plan (July 2004).
3) The quantum of affordable housing proposed is insufficient to meet the Council's housing needs and fails to meet the 50% provision as required under Policy 3A.9 of the London Plan, February 2008.