Well spotted Michael but I am sure our ever flexible planning officers will say that this is not a significant flaw in the planning application.

You will also know how defensive John Miller's merry men and women can get when some interfering amateur (not that is my opinion of you) points out that they might have got something wrong.

It is one of the many frustrating things about the local planning process that if the planners have made up their mind up to approve an application they have plenty of scope to say that such and such a factor compensates for another factor.

PS William Hill have stopped taking bets on whether the application will be granted.