Thank you lacb.

I know I got a bit uptight about all of this and I don't feel good about flying off the handle with Cheeky, however, all of what you've written there goes to show that the FSA's scores aren't what they might seem - and this is my whole reason for feeling that it's potentially unfair.

Of course open discussion can sort it all out in the end - but what has it achieved?

In my opinion nothing - because none of us really knows exactly how the scores have been arrived at by the inspector.

Maybe there are lots of you out there who DO know how it all works, in which case I'm over-reacting, but otherwise we're left to surmise and someone's livelihood could be jeopardised - at least in the short-term until they're scored again.

Does that make sense to anyone?