SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Does FH Soc want more affordable houses?
Author Message
Tim Lund


Posts: 255
Joined: Apr 2008
Post: #1
12-02-2013 10:11 AM

Good piece by Ferndinand Mount in the Standard last night, for instance this

Quote:
Another sure symptom that land shortage is to blame is that new homes in Britain are getting smaller. The square footage of the average new-build is infinitely less in Britain than in Germany or the US.

This palpable truth is still vigorously resisted by the old alliance of environmental groups and nimbys. “Why don’t we fill up those empty homes first?” they cry. “If only people could be persuaded to move to Salford or Scunthorpe, the shortage would disappear.” No, they won’t and it wouldn’t. There are always empty homes in a housing crisis, just as there are always thousands of job vacancies in times of high unemployment.

Then the green lobby chimes in, suggesting we build on brownfield sites first. To which the answer is, almost every available brownfield site which isn’t terminally toxic is up for development but that still won’t be enough. Then they say, what about all that land which the developers already have with planning permission? The truth is that every sensible developer has to have a stock of land in hand.


But I am bothered by his assumption that we have to build on greenfield sites, not so much because I have any good argument against it, but because, if it is true, it will be because we have developed our cities and suburbs in such a way that they cannot be redeveloped to accommodate the central pull of London. So we end up with unnecessarily dispersed settlement patterns, with much greater environmental impacts. We should think of houses as we do other consumer goods, as potentially recyclable, and not speculative assets.

If Ferndinand Mount it right, it also means that suburbs like Forest Hill and Sydenham will miss out on the greater economic vitality which new development will bring.[/quote]

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
RE: Does FH Soc want more affordable houses? - Tim Lund - 12-02-2013 10:11 AM