Well, on (b) I'd suggest that if planning policies mean we don't end up with the built environment people need, and one that is in particular unsustainable for young people, then the question of affordable housing should be part of the FH Soc remit.

The point about CIL and the Localism Act is relevant to ( c) - well planned development should bring in funding for enhancements to amenities. So another reason the FH Soc should have a positive view on higher densities.

On d), there may well be equality of opportunity within the Society, but is FH Soc is to act for the whole area rather than just for its members' interests, it should ask itself if it provided equal opportunity for future generations and current renters.

This post was last modified: 13-11-2012 07:49 PM by Tim Lund.