I don't think I have evaded the issue, I just have no more to contribute to this thread as I made clear months ago. The fact that a baronet writing in London's leading newspaper can use such appalling exaggeration shows the poor quality of the debate on a national level (only slightly better than the repetitive 'this is nonsense' when you don't understand a point).
Actually I have probably written more of my views on this thread than Ferndinand Mount did in his article in the Standard, and yet he almost certainly got paid to write his views, while mine come to you completely without charge. So why not carry on the debate with the prime minister's uncle rather than with me?