So preferable for whom; for retailers, for consumers who will have to pay more, or for potato farmers?
Good question, to which the answer has to be based on some overall assessment of the public good, which I'd suggest would mean having more food at affordable prices for people to eat, regardless of any 'smug self-righteous' interest group.
Perhaps we could have a similar test for housing policies.
This post was last modified: 16-10-2012 05:44 PM by Tim Lund.