I agree that it was a mistake to contest the planning application as it is apparent that the cost of bringing the shop front up to an acceptable standard probably makes no commercial sense with the current turnover in particular due to its current dilapidated state and the relatively large size. If there is sufficient support there are a number of other vacant units with more manageable shop fronts that are available and probably on very reasonable terms. Unless the unit is sold I suspect that the eyesore will remain for the foreseeable future.

I accept that the issue of use and maintenance are entirely seperate but when you have decades of dilapidations by the owner (who should have the funds as the unit is not mortgaged) then this should be considered as a factor.

However, FHSoc should be supported for all their hard work and ultimately the decision did not rest with them.

This post was last modified: 02-07-2013 09:21 AM by Chipcity.