I agree that it is a shame for such a dilapidated frontage remains in such a prominent position. I have no views over the use if the frontage was kept up to a reasonable state of repair.

I have checked the freehold title and interestingly there does not appear to be any leasehold interests registered against it of either the units above (presumably residential?) or the launderette.

This indicates, although it is not conclusive, that the launderette is on a short term let although the term of the lease could be up to seven years as this is the trigger for registration. However, the launderette may in any event have security of tenure and be permitted to renew on the expiry of the lease.

I was mainly checking to try and to obtain a copy of the lease to ascertain whether the freeholder has the repairing obligation for the frontage or more likely the tenant.

It would be interesting to know whether anyone is aware if the residential units above are let to the launderette as if not then the change of the freehold may result in the freeholder enforcing the repairing obligation of the launderette tenant to ensure that any letting or in particular sale of the residential parts are not adversely affected.

The freehold was acquired back in 2000 for £165,000 so I suspect that the freeholder was content to maintain the income stream without trying to maximise the potential. Hopefully, any new freeholder purchasing at today’s rates will likely take a more commercial view and ensure that the property is kept in repair especially if the plan includes the sale of the residential parts.

This post was last modified: 21-06-2013 04:49 PM by Chipcity.