Despite a few concerns about how the latest study still feels like tablets of stone being handed down from on high and staying with the positive.It's good to see Lewisham posting their feasibility study on FHP so soon after the Stakeholder meeting and offering a distinct choice of concepts and of architects to realise them. Hopefully everyone here will vote on the option that they most prefer.

The Willow Way scheme will surely find least favour as it so clearly breaks the Mayor's commitment to swimming facilities on the existing FHP site.

That leaves a choice between:
[a] a modifed HLM version of last year's options [minus Lousie House site] i.e. demolition of Pools and totally new build and
[b] Allies and Morrison idea for a retained frontage block and new pools.
If you want an idea of their local work HLM did Downham Pools while Allies & Morrison did the Horniman Museum Extension.

Last year's options were "concepts" and not "designs" and assuming these are the same, there is little point in criticising the specific design illustrations in the document. The new options now reflect the split in opinion last year between those who want totally modern and those who wish to retain some of the Victorain heritage - a division which did genuinely divide FH and not as some seem to suggest here the minority position of a few out of touch traditonalists or modernists.
I would urge people to now look forward and not to go back over the blame game and arguments from several months ago . Louise House is listed and all 3 council options accept this and appear to turn it into housing which I assume would help subsidise the pools. Personally, I'd have liked to see it incorporated with either the pools or as an extension to the Library as a community facility but that's another story...