The penalty should be the same whatever your background. It is not acceptable for one looter to go to jail and then lose their house, and for another to go to jail and then return to their mansion in Orpington.
So if you are going to impose draconian punishments on people on social housing, the same should apply to the rich.

If somebody from a middle-class or rich family goes out looting for the evening, then their family house, businesses, and assets should be sold off to pay for the damage, prison time, police time, court time etc. Anything left can be use to help with subsidised housing for families without convicted criminals.

Does that seem fair?