SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
The Royal Family: response to Roz
Author Message
jon14


Posts: 145
Joined: Sep 2007
Post: #1
14-06-2011 03:05 PM

Roz wrote:
What I want is for someone to provide evidence and a transparent and sound business case which justifies the continued amount of tax revenues we pay to support their lives and their existence and proves that they bring in more than they cost. Even a statement or two on added value would be acceptable.
And that includes the policing and security bills for royal (I'm no longer capitalising them).

If someone can genuinely show that they provide an unequivocal net positive return then I'll shut up for good on this one. Which should please quite a few people apparently.


You can't quantify all the benefits of having a royal family. Why should the head of state have to 'add value'? Have you quantified the benefits of an alternative to see if that adds up to an unequivocal net positive return?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
RE: The Royal Family: response to Roz - jon14 - 14-06-2011 03:05 PM