In an ideal world maybe there's a case for providing tattoo removals but definitely not when people are being denied potentially life saving drugs by various health authorities, on the grounds of cost.

So no to tattoo removal, except where they've been forcibly given.

My uncle had a proper old fashioned sailor's tattoo and it suited him, but it's all very subjective isn't it.
They look fine on sailors and men with nice arms. They really don't look good on everyone I'm afraid.

I have female friends with tattoos on their lower backs - the results are varied and even they would admit that now, a few years on.