SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Referendum on the Alternative Vote
Author Message
Baboonery


Posts: 581
Joined: Sep 2007
Post: #1
17-04-2011 03:06 PM

Michael,
A vote for an unsuccessful candidate is not wasted. It's just a vote for an unsuccessful candidate. By the same logic, a vote for an unsuccessful candidate is still 'wasted' under AV if it is not transferred to the voter's 2nd, 3rd or 38th preference, thereby resulting in them winning.

Similarly, tactical voting is not eliminated under AV. This is yet another lie propagated by the AV campaign. I know personally because I voted tactically in the Labour leadership election. It will be changed, but it won't be eliminated. Read the paper by Roger Mortimore of IPSOS MORI.

Oh, and if you don't like those fraudulent leaflets, don't vote for a system that is designed to favour the party that produces them.

AV is neither fair nor transparent. It is a terrible system. FPTP has its faults, but AV is a partisan fraud.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
RE: Referendum on the Alternative Vote - Baboonery - 17-04-2011 03:06 PM