SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Referendum on the Alternative Vote
Author Message
Baboonery


Posts: 581
Joined: Sep 2007
Post: #1
13-04-2011 03:25 PM

Robin. It's undemocratic and iniquitous because it gives fifth preferences equal weight to first preferences if we have that many counts. There is no way that someone's fifth preference (or for that matter, their second) should count the same as someone else's first. This is transparently unfair. AV is a partisan fraud being introduced by the LibDems, who don't actually want it – they'd much prefer STV, which is also democratically dubious but at least has a bit more logic to it – but see that it is to their massive electoral advantage. Alas, some on the Labour benches have been taken in by it (the current leader dimly included it in the last manifesto as a sop to the shallow anti-politics howls that were going round in 2010).

And I think in your earlier post, when you said 'wasted votes' you meant 'votes for unsuccessful candidates'. This is an election, not a school sports day where all must have prizes.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
RE: Referendum on the Alternative Vote - Baboonery - 13-04-2011 03:25 PM