SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Bumps vs cameras
Author Message
Snazy


Posts: 1,516
Joined: Jan 2008
Post: #1
27-01-2008 02:03 AM

Simple answer... ANPR and SPECS in town.
If they were serious about speed it would happen.

Im not supporting it by the way, but see dangers in all the current methods.
Cushions cause people to swere down the road. After they were introduced on Church Rise, people now zig zag down the road.
The proper humps on Sunderland are so badly built that they can be heard ripping peoples cars apart where the road has dropped from beneath the hump.

Camera's as stated cause people to reaction brake and slow for a 30 metre period then speed back up.

Cameras = revenue generators (to a degree)
Humps/Cushions = an end of year spend to keep next years budget high.

Neither are an effective method.

SPECS and ANPR = constant speed monitoring, reduced average speeds. At the end of the day, speed, get caught, pay the price. Smile

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
Bumps vs cameras - baggydave - 26-01-2008, 01:23 AM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - davidl - 26-01-2008, 09:52 AM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - michael - 26-01-2008, 10:40 AM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - steveb - 26-01-2008, 06:20 PM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - Snazy - 27-01-2008 02:03 AM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - grahamw - 29-01-2008, 01:56 PM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - Londondrz - 30-01-2008, 11:25 AM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - shzl400 - 30-01-2008, 01:31 PM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - Londondrz - 30-01-2008, 01:43 PM
RE: Bumps vs cameras - Snazy - 30-01-2008, 11:39 AM