SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Pages (3): « First < Previous 1 [2] 3 Next > Last »
Planning Application: 27 Shipman Road
Author Message
michael


Posts: 3,260
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #21
15-08-2010 10:56 AM

If you wish to object you should send an email to planning@lewisham.gov.uk quoting the reference DC/10/74983 and stating the reasons for your objections.

Does anybody know if the tree(s) have a TPO?

This would appear to count as 'infill' development and therefore it is worth quoting council policies:

Quote:
HSG 8 Backland and In-fill Development
Backland and in-fill development will be permitted provided the following criteria are met:
(a) sufficient garden depth and area should be retained by existing dwellings (see Policy HSG 7);
(b) the scheme must respect the character of the area, including the cumulative impact;
(e) on a road where additional on-street parking would not be permitted the development would not worsen any (on-street) parking problems;
(e) there should be no appreciable loss of privacy and amenity for adjoining houses and their back gardens;


I have removed the paragraphs that clearly do not apply and have left the items that some people have suggested may be an issue for this development. (There are two paragraphs called 'e')

Similar issues are covered in HSG5:

Quote:
HSG 5 Layout and Design of New Residential Development
The Council expects all new residential development to be attractive, to be neighbourly and to meet the functional requirements of its future inhabitants. The Council will, therefore, only permit new residential development which:
(a) provides a satisfactory level of privacy, outlook and natural lighting with appropriate provision of private amenity space;

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tim Walder


Posts: 67
Joined: Mar 2008
Post: #22
15-08-2010 08:46 PM

Thanks Michael for your help.

I have writtena letter of objection and I hope some of the other neighbours will too. The people in 42, 40 and 38 Shipman Road will have their sunlight blocked by this too, so I am hoping they will object.

This could be an interesting test of the new PPS3 guidelines.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Elizabeth25


Posts: 212
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #23
16-08-2010 04:27 PM

I've just sent my 'objection' email to the planning email. Thumbsup

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Erekose


Posts: 557
Joined: May 2010
Post: #24
19-08-2010 10:15 PM

Looks like a clear case of over development to me with a definite lack of amenity space for the new units. I would guess that a couple of flats is more realistic.
I note the Architects seem to be using an Educational release of the drafting software......very naughty if its true.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tim Walder


Posts: 67
Joined: Mar 2008
Post: #25
20-08-2010 10:29 AM

I notice the number of objections is now up to six.

Let's make it ten and get a public meeting.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
grahamw


Posts: 58
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #26
20-08-2010 01:00 PM

It looks fine to me, don't see what the fuss is about, so won't be objecting.

But then it's Not In My Back Yard...

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DerbyHillTop


Posts: 120
Joined: Aug 2008
Post: #27
23-08-2010 10:04 PM

Just emailed my objection to the planning. It is just too small. But apperently it could be used by a young family and ambulance disabled. Confused

In the smaller flats there is no room for a washing machine! Ah, but you could make cup of tea.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tim Walder


Posts: 67
Joined: Mar 2008
Post: #28
24-08-2010 08:13 PM

The timing of this is all very interesting.

I had asked the Council to consider a Tree Protection Order for the attractive fir tree in the garden. The Council officer was considering this and was due to visit tomorrow (Wednesday 25th August) to look at the tree and take a decision on a TPO.

Guess what?

This afternoon workmen came and sawed it down.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blushingsnail


Posts: 371
Joined: Dec 2005
Post: #29
24-08-2010 08:25 PM

RIP fir tree. It was a lovely tree. Has all the creeper gone too? It looked beautiful in autumn when the leaves turned red.

DerbyHillTop: good point about lack of space for a washing machine. Where's the nearest launderette? FH town centre or is there one on Stanstead Road? A 5 minute walk at least.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JamieP


Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 2009
Post: #30
24-08-2010 11:04 PM

Hi

I'm an infrequent visitor to SE23 forum, but this thread is very useful.
I live in a house very nearby that would be affected by the development.

I've just sent an objection on the grounds of light, privacy, and parking, as well as responding to some of the assertions in the Design & Access Statement, referencing recent statements by Greg Clark and noting today's tree-felling.

Thanks to all who gave tips and advice here - it really helped.

Cheers

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Yasmine


Posts: 17
Joined: Jun 2010
Post: #31
24-08-2010 11:40 PM

It all seems very squashed and compact to me. Can a resident who does not live on the same street write to object ?

I am going off topic here for a minute, just to say that the council has adopted a systematic approach to the removal of many of our old and healthy trees all around Forest Hill, without any apperently valid reason. Whilst at Southwark, for instance, they have decided to plant trees in East Dulwich a while ago, at times against residents will (given the dimensions of some streets over there), Lewisham seem unstoppable in the pursuit of making our streets less verdant. Does anybody know why this happens ?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
neuchatel1


Posts: 2
Joined: Aug 2010
Post: #32
25-08-2010 10:46 AM

seen site looks a bit of a mess surley houses would be more appropie than 4 falts?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
michael


Posts: 3,260
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #33
25-08-2010 02:10 PM

The Forest Hill Society has responded to this development, you can read the response at http://www.foresthillsociety.com/2010/08...ation.html

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Muss


Posts: 50
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #34
26-08-2010 06:05 PM

Maybe the tree was chopped down so the plot of land can be consistent with the Application for Planning Permission received on 26 July 2010 - http://acolnet.lewisham.gov.uk/ACOLLATEDOCS/69143_1.pdf

Section 16 (Trees and Hedges) states that there are no "trees or hedges on the proposed developement site". Because if there was, a full Tree survey would have to be submitted with the application.

Also section 10 - Boundary treatments (e.g. fences, walls) is ticked "Not Applicable", but the drawings show the development connected to 29 Shipman Road. Or have I misunderstood this?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blushingsnail


Posts: 371
Joined: Dec 2005
Post: #35
28-08-2010 07:52 PM

Yasmine: anyone can object (or support!) planning applications. You don't have to be a neighbour of the proposed development.

Trees in Lewisham: actually I think there is/has been a project to plant more street trees in Perry Vale Ward, although I haven't noticed any. Might have been part of the local assembly spending.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Elizabeth25


Posts: 212
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #36
29-08-2010 08:56 AM

I got a letter in the mail yesterday. Of course, Lewisham Council does subscribe to the 'plain English' rules & regs.

But it seems to say the plans have changed:

"The construction of 2, two storey buildings, plus roofspace at land adjacent to, 29 Shipman Rd SE23 to provide 1, three bedroom and 1, four bedroom house (Amended Plans Received). Previous objections and comments received will still be taken into account."

So it sounds as if the initial plans for a six flat building have been shelved, replaced instead by two single family homes. Is that correct? The letter is not clear.

I'm still a wary of squeezing two houses into that space, but two single family homes is better than six tiny flats in my opinion.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
michael


Posts: 3,260
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #37
29-08-2010 10:02 AM

I sounds like they will be building two family homes rather than four flats but we will have to wait to see the plans next week on http://acolnet.lewisham.gov.uk/LEWIS-XSL...mkey=60648

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
neuchatel1


Posts: 2
Joined: Aug 2010
Post: #38
31-08-2010 08:38 PM

yes seems two single dwellings rather than four flats perhaps they have takennotice of the forum fair play to them!

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tim Walder


Posts: 67
Joined: Mar 2008
Post: #39
08-09-2010 12:53 PM

We have had a letter from Lewisham Planning Service which says:

"A number of letters of objection and concern have been received and in these cases it is Council policy to offer to hold an informal meeting or a drop in session with local residents to enable an assessment to be made of the areas of concern before the application is considered by the Council's planning committee.

A local meeting has now been aranged for 7pm on Wednesday 15th september 2010 in Committee Room 3 in the Civic Centre at Lewisham Town Hall, Catford Road, Catford, London SE5 4RU and you are invited to attend. Local ward councillors will also be invited.

The applicants may wish to give a short presentation of their proposals."

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mp123


Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 2010
Post: #40
16-09-2010 08:59 AM

Can tell me what happen at meeting at town hall?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Possibly Related Topics ...
Topic: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Lewisham Council approve "controversial" planning application samuelsen 1 4,447 10-11-2022 04:43 PM
Last Post: taymountgrange
  Taymount Grange | Planning Application | DC/22/127431 taymountgrange 6 5,273 10-11-2022 04:38 PM
Last Post: HannahM
  Planning application to convert Home Accessories Extra to a coffee shop hillview 8 11,479 22-04-2018 01:35 PM
Last Post: hillview
  Planning application to convert Forest Hill Co-op to a hotel hillview 12 13,237 10-03-2018 02:34 PM
Last Post: Uhuru
  Planning application to change Honor Oak Supermarket to a bar nitoda 10 18,953 03-07-2016 08:42 PM
Last Post: HannahD
  Planning Application: 1 Manor Mount Mrjamon 50 57,529 14-12-2015 11:46 AM
Last Post: Londondrz
  The 4 Redberry Grove Planning Application robertlondon 21 32,994 15-09-2015 07:16 AM
Last Post: JRW
  Planning Application: M&Co to become a Morrisons Local? edpaff 141 162,932 09-09-2015 04:42 PM
Last Post: michael
  Planning Application: 51-53 Canonbie Road penfold 88 117,861 02-05-2014 02:04 PM
Last Post: Hunter
  Planning Application - Hindsley Place and Westbourne Drive michael 124 135,213 09-01-2014 01:46 PM
Last Post: Perryman
  Planning Application: 120 Stanstead Road michael 67 80,390 11-12-2013 03:50 PM
Last Post: Mr_Numbers
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise ForestGump 58 74,089 02-04-2013 05:53 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise NewForester 30 43,632 02-08-2012 05:00 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: Land to the rear of 107 Honor Oak Park alethius 5 10,251 25-06-2012 12:02 PM
Last Post: alethius
  Codrington Hill - planning application? blushingsnail 1 6,070 24-05-2012 11:02 PM
Last Post: megan
  Planning Application - 113 Bovill Road davidl 7 12,842 21-04-2012 12:06 PM
Last Post: HOPcat
  Planning application: 33 Dartmouth Road Baboonery 16 19,548 29-11-2011 10:41 AM
Last Post: IWereAbsolutelyFuming
  Planning Application: 15 Davids Road NewForester 4 8,513 18-08-2011 08:34 AM
Last Post: notstoppin
  building works on the corner of Shipman Road and Siddons Road Prampusher 3 6,534 04-08-2011 10:25 AM
Last Post: Sherwood
  Planning Application: 139 Sunderland Road RobF 48 55,228 04-06-2011 10:00 PM
Last Post: michael