Perhaps Piplings can answer why certain of their neighbours, maybe those with the benefit of a restrictive covenant, might need advice on decisions they have been asked to make?
If these neighbours requested information from TLRA about what these options mean shouldn't TLRA give it to them (or do TLRA need to poll all the residents on the estate before they do anything based on the one person one vote rule?)
I think the note is relatively factual letting people know what the options are. If you imply a bias by TLRA in that it states a precedent will be set then I agree this case will be judged on its merits but "courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided" (Wikipedia). If this is the same for the Lands Tribunal then it will set a precedent