As members you do have the right to appoint a Committee of your choosing through elections and to decide priorities and an approach which can be enshrined in the constitution. If members are not happy there are routes to follow, provided of course all such avenues are not blocked.

It is hard to get rid of people therefore if they have become rooted in the role and have managed to dismantle the opposition and the route for that opposition to make its voice known. I am not sure if that's been the case here but its clear to me that this has become a truly unpleasant state of affairs without seemingly any accountability to the members or even lipservice to same. The Piplings issue now seems to be taking a back seat to some ghastly community politics.