PS Having read the
Letter again I fully agree with you about inaccuracy and
Misrepresentation. Amendments to covenants do not set the precedent suggested ; they have to be considered on a case by case basis and also there remains stringent planning controls. One would assume that the writer would be fully informed of this however continued to act vexatiously against no. 5. Good luck with opposing this. I have to say I feel lucky not having a RA running around stirring up bad feeling like they seem to do up there.