I think the balance of support and objectors to the nursery in the estate can only be ascertained by a meeting. So the sooner the better. The delay I refer to is the insistence on a signed letter with 15 inked signatures, went it is evident that a meeting is needed from the activity on this forum, the 200+ signatures on the supporters website and no doubt correspondence with the committee. It is a matter of doubt that needs resolution.

There is a credible threat to home businesses, because raising the arcane matter of restrictive covenants gives a route to court for any neighbour with a grudge, and there is a risk the technicality will be supported by the court and costs awarded accordingly. There is no need to prove nuisance in this case.

This post was last modified: 04-02-2012 02:00 PM by Les.