Saddened, re

1) Apparently the case against Piplings is being brought on a no win no fee basis.

2) It appears the council found there was not sufficient disturbance hence planning was granted. The TLERA then raised the option to fight Piplings using the covenant. So it appears the case now whether the covenant is being breached because Piplings is not a doctors or a solicitors, surely if Piplings are guilty of breaking the covenant it's the same for anyone else who is doing so.