Straighttalk says "The association's profile in the case has heightened since the owners of the nursery chose to go to the Lands Chamber to have the covenant altered."

Evidence posted on this thread taken from TLERA's own minutes show that TLERA choose to dig up the covenant to use this as a reason why Piplings should close. Did they not expect a reaction? The reaction from Piplings to have the covenant altered seems understandable. Perhaps TLERA should have considered all their members that are in effect breaking the covenant before they decided to use this argument against Piplings.

So have 15 members called for a meeting? Isn't it time that the TLERA organisers who have been involved in this admit that a mistake has been made and attempt to make it right?

Straightalk - is it really, such a massive inconvenience to live by a nursery? Which is well run and isn't causing a problem for other residents? Can't a meeting be held and a compromise found? FYI I live beside a school here in Forest Hill, and have never felt it an inconvenience, not once. So I really can't understand the issue.