SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors


SE23 Forum / Sections / Wider Topics / Statistical stupidity

Post Reply  Post Topic 
Statistical stupidity
Author Message
nevermodern


Posts: 653
Joined: Feb 2007
Post: #1
19-12-2007 02:44 PM

Not sure the initial question is being answered here: if the most women on average work for less years in a lifetime than most men, wouldn't the average woman's pay be less than the average man's? Not trying to be controversial here, just interested in the answer without accusations being levelled of misogyny and sexism.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Facebook

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 15-12-2007, 05:18 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 15-12-2007, 09:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 15-12-2007, 10:13 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 16-12-2007, 12:39 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 17-12-2007, 11:46 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 16-12-2007, 01:18 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 16-12-2007, 02:25 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 17-12-2007, 12:06 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Dotcom - 17-12-2007, 02:21 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 17-12-2007, 02:50 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Dotcom - 17-12-2007, 03:25 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 17-12-2007, 08:41 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 17-12-2007, 10:36 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 18-12-2007, 10:59 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 17-12-2007, 11:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 18-12-2007, 12:14 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 18-12-2007, 10:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - baggydave - 19-12-2007, 12:06 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 11:32 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 19-12-2007, 12:30 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 19-12-2007, 12:42 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 19-12-2007, 10:31 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 11:26 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 19-12-2007, 12:49 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 19-12-2007, 02:10 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 02:37 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 02:38 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007 02:44 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 02:49 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 03:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 03:59 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 04:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 03:58 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 04:24 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 04:03 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 04:06 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 04:24 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 04:15 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 04:33 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 19-12-2007, 07:09 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - hilltopgeneral - 19-12-2007, 07:39 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 19-12-2007, 07:51 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 20-12-2007, 01:04 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 20-12-2007, 11:15 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - baggydave - 24-12-2007, 01:36 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 24-12-2007, 01:30 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 24-12-2007, 01:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 25-12-2007, 02:23 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 25-12-2007, 10:52 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 25-12-2007, 11:24 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 26-12-2007, 11:10 PM