SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Statistical stupidity
Author Message
Ooperlooper


Posts: 104
Joined: Jun 2006
Post: #1
17-12-2007 07:41 PM

Quote:
My employer is now stating that it must count years spent on maternity leave as 'in the job' experience in any promotion decisions, or suchlike.


...and employers are now advised not to advertise job specs by saying anything like "must have x years of experience" due to the legislation against age discrimination introduced a few months ago.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 15-12-2007, 04:18 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 15-12-2007, 08:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 15-12-2007, 09:13 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 15-12-2007, 11:39 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 17-12-2007, 10:46 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 16-12-2007, 12:18 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 16-12-2007, 01:25 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 17-12-2007, 11:06 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Dotcom - 17-12-2007, 01:21 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 17-12-2007, 01:50 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Dotcom - 17-12-2007, 02:25 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 17-12-2007 07:41 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 17-12-2007, 09:36 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 18-12-2007, 09:59 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 17-12-2007, 10:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 18-12-2007, 11:14 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 18-12-2007, 09:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - baggydave - 18-12-2007, 11:06 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 10:32 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 18-12-2007, 11:30 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 18-12-2007, 11:42 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 19-12-2007, 09:31 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 10:26 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 19-12-2007, 11:49 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 19-12-2007, 01:10 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 01:37 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 01:38 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 01:44 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 01:49 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 02:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 02:59 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 03:05 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 02:58 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 19-12-2007, 03:24 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 03:03 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 03:06 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Elizabeth25 - 19-12-2007, 03:24 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 03:15 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 19-12-2007, 03:33 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 19-12-2007, 06:09 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - hilltopgeneral - 19-12-2007, 06:39 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 19-12-2007, 06:51 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - nevermodern - 20-12-2007, 12:04 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Jane - 20-12-2007, 10:15 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - baggydave - 24-12-2007, 12:36 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Baboonery - 24-12-2007, 12:30 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - shzl400 - 24-12-2007, 12:54 PM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 25-12-2007, 01:23 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 25-12-2007, 09:52 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - roz - 25-12-2007, 10:24 AM
RE: Statistical stupidity - Ooperlooper - 26-12-2007, 10:10 PM