Okay - Final attempts:

If either of these (and particularly the first one) are used, it is important that the sections in red are included. The first is simpler, but runs the risk that people will ignore the advisory note. The second is potentially less clear, but also potentially produces less ambiguous results. I am hoping that reordering the options and tidying up the phrasing has made it a bit easier to understand.

A)

Should the Jerk Cookout be at Horniman Gardens?
(PLEASE READ ALL 4 OPTIONS, AND ACCOMPANYING NOTE, BEFORE VOTING)

1) Yes, definitely.
2) No, definitely not
3) Only with effective crowd, traffic and parking controls
4) Don't know/can't decide "

NOTE: *IMPORTANT* : A vote for #3 should not be regarded as either a 'yes' or 'no' vote by other means. Results from #3 are NOT to be aggregated to any other category in analyses of this poll.

2)

Should the Jerk Cookout be at Horniman Gardens?
(PLEASE READ ALL 5 OPTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE VOTING)

1) Yes, definitely.
2) Yes, but with effective crowd, traffic and parking controls
3) No, definitely not
4) No, not unless there are effective crowd, traffic and parking controls
5) Don't know/can't decide


So there y'go. Use, amend, chuck out and start again - whatever is best.
I am happy to go with either Admin's decision, or forum consensus.