SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
BNP
Author Message
michael


Posts: 3,261
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #1
13-06-2009 08:14 PM

Code:
.           2006     2009
lab         38%     26%    -12%
con         18%     16%     -2%
lib         21%     14%     -7%
green       12%     18%     +6%
others      11%     26%    +15% (including BNP 0% to 4%)

Reduction in number of voters = 10%


This does suggest voters switching away from the parties at Westminster, but I shall not try to interpret the party results further as I try very hard not to show any party political bias publicly (other than a strong dislike for the BNP).

One other point I would make is comparing these numbers to the petition to Keep Swimming in Forst Hill, a petition that got around 5,800 signatures mainly around 3 wards (out of 54 wards in Lewisham - or 5% of the population).

Apart from representing more people than any of the parties other than the 4 big parties. This is taken across a small part of Lewisham. In fact the number of signatures represents 10% of the total electorate in Lewisham from 2009, in an area 5% of the size. Or to put it in simple terms, approximately 3000-4000 people voted across three ward - less than the signatures on the petition. This would suggest that the petition is more representative of the local community than ALL POLITICAL PARTIES COMBINED.

Of course I would like to think that turnout in Forest Hill, Perry Vale, and Sydenham is higher than in other wards. Even so this shows just how strong feeling is in the local area regarding the location of the pools.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
BNP - Contrary Mary - 20-05-2009, 01:05 PM
RE: Removal of Offensive Literature from Election Leaflet Bundles: Is it Possible? - michael - 13-06-2009 08:14 PM
RE: BNP - Perryman - 18-06-2009, 03:22 PM
RE: BNP - RussB - 18-06-2009, 10:31 PM
RE: BNP - Dan on the Hill - 19-06-2009, 11:05 AM
RE: BNP - brian - 19-06-2009, 12:10 PM
RE: BNP - roz - 19-06-2009, 01:41 PM
RE: BNP - michael - 19-06-2009, 02:20 PM
RE: BNP - michael - 19-06-2009, 02:42 PM
RE: BNP - brian - 19-06-2009, 03:04 PM
RE: BNP - SophieBee - 19-06-2009, 03:38 PM
RE: BNP - Perryman - 19-06-2009, 04:46 PM
RE: BNP - brian - 19-06-2009, 04:52 PM
RE: BNP - michael - 19-06-2009, 05:59 PM
RE: BNP - Dan on the Hill - 22-06-2009, 10:27 AM
RE: BNP - Baboonery - 22-06-2009, 11:24 AM
RE: BNP - michael - 22-06-2009, 02:08 PM
RE: BNP - Dan on the Hill - 22-06-2009, 03:15 PM
RE: BNP - roz - 22-06-2009, 03:44 PM
RE: BNP - Perryman - 22-06-2009, 03:50 PM
RE: BNP - Dan on the Hill - 22-06-2009, 03:53 PM
RE: BNP - roz - 22-06-2009, 03:58 PM
RE: BNP - Dan on the Hill - 22-06-2009, 04:04 PM
RE: BNP - brian - 22-06-2009, 07:43 PM
RE: BNP - roz - 23-06-2009, 12:11 PM
RE: BNP - brian - 23-06-2009, 03:19 PM