A debate that is entirely unexpected - especially on the part of Chris Beach and his wingman from Norfolk, londondrz.

You may remember londondrz - a man who made the public post that if Chris was found to have lied or acted the way he was being accused of in the Flava Baker fiasco - "Chris was on his own".

Unfortunately for londondrz, Chris Beach confessed publicly to having done just that - deceived everyone, set up a sock-puppet account and lied prolifically about why he felt justified in doing it and re-stated his biggest untruth - that Chris Beach had been attacked by a woman and that he had reported her to the police.

Falsified police documents were shown to key players - many perceived them as being forged and no one ever got to see a valid Report Number from any police service that could be checked. An independent witness averred that the MPS had confirmed no report had ever been logged with them or with Kent Police.

Interestingly Mr Beach has revisited this incident in recent days and is once more grandstanding on his version of events.

So no signs yesterday that londondrz is following his own decree - no evidence that Chris is on his own.

Not only has londondrz removed the Flava Baker thread to hide the degree of villainy that Chris Beach's artifice had created, against a 90+% majority of forum members voting to retain its presence, he feels he can demand that posters provide evidence of where he has hurt or damaged the community.

He alleges he knows of only one banning from the forum.

A woefully poor memory or a wilful misstatement in the face of the number of bans that have happened and are well into double figures against a backdrop of assaults on innocent forum members exceeding the mid-30's in number and added to that are unprincipled attacks on former moderators and founder members of SE23.life.

In a deliberative and repetitive fashion.

Ordinary decent members on being aware of this degree of mendacity from anyone would undoubtedly move to a foxtrot oscar standpoint.

So why are these aggressive actions of recent days tolerated by the new owner @foresthull2 ?

It is not as if Chris Beach and londondrz can point any finger at the "old-guard" of alleged malcontents - they have either been banned speciously or walked away from a forum who's integrity is being trashed daily now. Chris Beach and londondrz are warring with a whole new generation of posters with whom they disagree and elect to treat them as enemies and thereby feel justified in acting aggressively toward the new innocents.

It would be well understood if most ordinary decent members of our community - and who really care about our community's wellbeing, will see this juncture as the turning point for the continued existence of SE23.life - or whether they are watching its destruction at the hands of two malicious outsiders intent upon acting aggressively towards posters with whom the have differences of opinion.

It is risible that a defence is mounted for Chris Beach on the grounds of his hard work for the forums. There were many others who put honest hard work into the setup on a greater scale than his.

This post was last modified: 12-01-2021 12:04 PM by jgdoherty.