SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   73,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
Canvas & Cream  Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Pages (3): « First < Previous 1 2 [3] Last »
Planning Application: 139 Sunderland Road
Author Message
RobF


Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2008
Post: #41
28-06-2010 10:31 AM

Thanks for pointing this out Michael - I guess it's no surprise that they came back for a third time.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobF


Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2008
Post: #42
28-06-2010 10:41 AM

Michael,
your link only goes to the drawings - is there a link to the rest of the application?
I've tried to search the Lewisham planning website, but can't find anything for this address since the previous application last year.
Rob.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
michael


Posts: 3,261
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #43
28-06-2010 11:07 AM

RobF,
It is being considered as a revision to the previous application DC/09/70987
http://acolnet.lewisham.gov.uk/LEWIS-XSL...mkey=56115

I'm glad you are still keeping an eye on this thread.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobF


Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2008
Post: #44
28-06-2010 11:16 AM

Thanks Michael,

Definitely keeping an eye on it.

Thanks for keeping an eye on the application - as local residents (I live almost opposite) we've had NO notification from the council that the plans have been amended (and the original plans were submitted over a year ago).

I'll study the new plans and let you know what I think. At a first glance, the density (and associated knock-on effects such as the parking problems it will cause) is still definitely going to be a problem.

Rob.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Perryman


Posts: 822
Joined: Dec 2006
Post: #45
28-06-2010 12:47 PM

Those plans are misleading with regard the rear of the building.
For both first and second floor plans, it marks in the 'original' ground floor extent of the building, which includes the ground floor extension.

It appears that the new building will project out to a similar extent as now, but this is not the case.

For the whole of the second floor, the current building aligns with the other houses and that is true for the first floor also, apart from a narrow half-height attic room extension.

If this building is allowed to project to the rear, why not their neighbours more-so, in a race to the back fence?

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobF


Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2008
Post: #46
02-07-2010 05:56 PM

Michael,

Will the FHS be objecting again to this proposal? I believe that today is the closing date for objections - given that the revised drawings application was only posted on the 18th June, it's a very short timeframe for neighbours to object. What if people are on holiday (as I was last week) for a couple of weeks - then they would completely miss it.

I will be complaining about this short timeframe along with my objection.

Rob.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
michael


Posts: 3,261
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #47
02-07-2010 08:54 PM

Yes. I sent an email to the planning department yesterday confirming most of our previous objections still stand.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobF


Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2008
Post: #48
02-07-2010 11:12 PM

Thanks Michael, I will be sending a similar objection.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
michael


Posts: 3,261
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #49
04-06-2011 10:00 PM

After more than two years since the original application the planning officers have rejected the application:

Quote:
1) The existing building is considered to make an important contribution to the character of the surrounding area, and its demolition would thereby detract from the appearance of the streetscene, whilst compromising the visual quality of the row of Edwardian villas, without demonstrating that a suitable replacement building would be constructed. ...

2) The proposed outline application represents an overdevelopment of the site, emphasised by the uncomfortably positioned main entrance within a narrow side passageway and the size of the proposed building, which would significantly exceed the size and depth of neighbouring properties, whilst failing to respect the established rear building line. Subsequently, the building would be likely to impact detrimentally upon the residential amenities of neighbouring occupiers.....


Thumbup

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pages (3): « First < Previous 1 2 [3] Last »

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Possibly Related Topics ...
Topic: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Lewisham Council approve "controversial" planning application samuelsen 1 4,795 10-11-2022 04:43 PM
Last Post: taymountgrange
  Taymount Grange | Planning Application | DC/22/127431 taymountgrange 6 6,044 10-11-2022 04:38 PM
Last Post: HannahM
  Planning application to convert Home Accessories Extra to a coffee shop hillview 8 12,873 22-04-2018 01:35 PM
Last Post: hillview
  Planning application to convert Forest Hill Co-op to a hotel hillview 12 14,277 10-03-2018 02:34 PM
Last Post: Uhuru
  Pheasant loose on Sunderland Road??? Mr_Numbers 28 28,255 16-03-2017 12:56 PM
Last Post: michael
  Mugging in the alley between Sunderland and Trilby Road Dan77 2 5,732 14-11-2016 11:01 AM
Last Post: BigED
  Planning application to change Honor Oak Supermarket to a bar nitoda 10 20,082 03-07-2016 08:42 PM
Last Post: HannahD
  New nursery on Sunderland Road? chezbubbles 1 4,998 06-06-2016 01:49 PM
Last Post: mrwandle
  Planning Application: 1 Manor Mount Mrjamon 50 61,603 14-12-2015 11:46 AM
Last Post: Londondrz
  The 4 Redberry Grove Planning Application robertlondon 21 35,294 15-09-2015 07:16 AM
Last Post: JRW
  Planning Application: M&Co to become a Morrisons Local? edpaff 141 178,328 09-09-2015 04:42 PM
Last Post: michael
  Crime Alert Message - robbery between Sunderland Road and Trilby Road Tim Lund 28 36,683 02-12-2014 05:33 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: 51-53 Canonbie Road penfold 88 123,557 02-05-2014 02:04 PM
Last Post: Hunter
  Planning Application - Hindsley Place and Westbourne Drive michael 124 142,473 09-01-2014 01:46 PM
Last Post: Perryman
  Planning Application: 120 Stanstead Road michael 67 86,071 11-12-2013 03:50 PM
Last Post: Mr_Numbers
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise ForestGump 58 78,402 02-04-2013 05:53 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: 6 Church Rise NewForester 30 46,204 02-08-2012 05:00 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Planning Application: Land to the rear of 107 Honor Oak Park alethius 5 11,332 25-06-2012 12:02 PM
Last Post: alethius
  Planning Application: 27 Shipman Road theirpuppet 50 62,960 07-06-2012 10:25 AM
Last Post: emma
  Codrington Hill - planning application? blushingsnail 1 6,536 24-05-2012 11:02 PM
Last Post: megan