I won't respond to the petty personal abuse about what Brian thinks I may or may not have noticed in and around Forest Hill but what have noticed is that there is and has been historically a real element of snobbery between SE23 and SE26.
I remember someone who had moved to a road off Thorpewood Ave being put down by a Horniman's resident because they had the wrong postcode to claim they lived in Forest Hill. This attitude is reflected in many-not all- of the keep the pools in SE23 points placed here. Does it really matter if it is on the original site or one bus stop further up the road? How much fuss would there be from SE23 if it were placed, say, near Mayo Park? A bigger distance away than WW from the original site but still in SE23?
I don't mind if it is SE23 or SE26 as long as is reasonably close to the FH site and it is built now.

Someone from either side may like to explain how elected representatives for Forest Hill took votes from people in both SE26 and SE23 and yet resorted to misguiding people about the proposed site of the pool? Suggesting it would be much further away than was proposed.

When we are looking for votes in SE26 -Oh we are all part of the Forest Hill community!
Now we're looking from support from another electorate- Oh SE26, you don't count as Forest Hill anymore.