I think the se23.com option survey will be representative of SE23 - who exactly will vote for a significant public facility to be moved further away from their home? It adds value to the area and therefore to people's homes. For the non car owner, not many will vote for an extra 10min walk when they may well have walked 20mins to get to the existing pool site. Those 2 groups surely make up a healthy majority.

The problem is, a se26 survey will choose the upper sydenham site despite many/most already being in the Bridge and Crystal Palace pool 'catchment' areas. Unless the results are weighted to take this into account, another public consultation is pointless and will end in deadlock.

Also why is it that the existing pools site is the one the council perhaps would rather build homes on? Answer: because this site has the greater value.
But why does it have greater value? Answer: partly because it is easy walking distance to FH station, and major bus stops.
But in my opinion, the better transport links are exactly the reason the pools should remain where they are.