option 3 - lovely detailed facade of the pools that are hidden away down a narrow street where there are a number of industrial buildings, uninviting unimpressive and no environmental value. FH needs a symbol of change to move forward and out of the downward spiral it is in, this don't cut it. the proposal for the residential development on pool site is a very bad idea, very badly laid out and i certainly would not like to live in the houses that abut the site, very intimidating and overlooked. have not been listening?

option 2 - i have wanted to see a proposal for keeping the facade of the pools from day one, and they should have done this from the beginning, then the unpopular bunch that fought to list the buildings would not have existed. it looks like an terrible option and i fear for the other plot and the potential mass of the residential development for the sake of keeping the facade. the pools proposal its self looks a growth hideous and unfitting, now can all agree that keeping the front of the pools is a bad idea?

option 1 - a green roof, a far more inclusive and inviting facade, a greater connection with the wider community and they have considered the environmental landscape all very positive things. i am guessing that the residential bit will happen at a later, if we were stuck with the first image that would be on the money, it is a shame that the residential development is so big. but seemingly more realistic to actually work for the community and it environment.

option 1 gets my vote, i do not think it is an option to keep the facade of the pools because a small and very noisy group want them for nostalgic sensitivity, to keep the pools out of view is no driver for change development either placing residential on the pools site would mass housing and ruin the positive environmental texture we have at the moment.