SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Traffic diversion
Author Message
Applespider


Posts: 285
Joined: Feb 2006
Post: #1
04-02-2014 11:49 PM

The fact that they dug it up a few weeks earlier can often be intentional.

In December, Thames Water dug up the road in Wood Vale and then closed it all up again the next day but left quite a bit of blue paint around. And then they've opened it all up again last week and, presumably, fixed it.

A neighbour spoke to the contractors and was told that they often do an initial dig to check the extent of the work required. If it looks like a simple fix, they'll do it then and there but if they think it's a bigger job but not an emergency, they'll fill back in and schedule it in for a proper fix.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 22-01-2014, 09:06 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - gbrownings - 22-01-2014, 10:01 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - Mr_Numbers - 22-01-2014, 10:06 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - Iain - 22-01-2014, 10:52 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - abster - 22-01-2014, 01:46 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - helenS29 - 23-01-2014, 12:10 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - MightyMouse - 23-01-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - shzl400 - 23-01-2014, 09:57 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 23-01-2014, 10:14 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - assilemwine - 23-01-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 23-01-2014, 09:34 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Baboonery - 23-01-2014, 10:12 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 24-01-2014, 10:14 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - philip - 25-01-2014, 03:57 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 26-01-2014, 01:04 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - Sherwood - 26-01-2014, 04:04 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - OakR - 29-01-2014, 04:35 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Belle - 29-01-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Hopmatty - 01-02-2014, 10:09 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - faultythinking - 02-02-2014, 12:04 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - squashst - 02-02-2014, 09:01 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - OakR - 02-02-2014, 08:53 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - ontheedge - 02-02-2014, 11:07 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - lacb - 03-02-2014, 11:38 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - philip - 03-02-2014, 12:29 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - lacb - 03-02-2014, 12:58 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 03-02-2014, 05:02 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 03-02-2014, 05:24 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Baboonery - 03-02-2014, 06:34 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Iain - 03-02-2014, 07:03 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - shzl400 - 04-02-2014, 09:32 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 04-02-2014, 11:14 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Applespider - 04-02-2014 11:49 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 02-03-2014, 09:24 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - hoona - 02-03-2014, 10:59 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 03-03-2014, 09:34 PM