SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Post Reply  Post Topic 
Traffic diversion
Author Message
Cllr Paul Upex


Posts: 41
Joined: Jan 2014
Post: #1
22-01-2014 11:03 AM

Hi I just wanted to post and introduce myself as one of the Labour Council Candidates for Forest Hill Ward in 2014. Below is some information supplied by Thames water regarding the disruption along Deveonshire Road and surrounding area.

Emergency repair work Thames Water is undertaking to repair a leak on a large water main in Honor Oak Park.

The leak has caused damage to the road surface and for safety reasons we need to close a section of Honor Oak Park to assess the damage and undertake repair works. We are working very closely with highway officers at LB Lewisham to minimise the disruption to local residents and ensure our emergency repair works can be completed as soon as possible. They are changing the diversion for HGVs, to take them away from Devonshire Road.

There is no impact on customers’ water supply as a result of this leak.

Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Messages In This Topic
Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 22-01-2014, 09:06 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - gbrownings - 22-01-2014, 10:01 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - Mr_Numbers - 22-01-2014, 10:06 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - Iain - 22-01-2014, 10:52 AM
Traffic Diversion Devonshire Road - Thames Water - Cllr Paul Upex - 22-01-2014 11:03 AM
RE: Traffic diversion? - abster - 22-01-2014, 01:46 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - helenS29 - 23-01-2014, 12:10 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - MightyMouse - 23-01-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - shzl400 - 23-01-2014, 09:57 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 23-01-2014, 10:14 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - assilemwine - 23-01-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 23-01-2014, 09:34 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Baboonery - 23-01-2014, 10:12 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 24-01-2014, 10:14 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - philip - 25-01-2014, 03:57 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 26-01-2014, 01:04 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - Sherwood - 26-01-2014, 04:04 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - OakR - 29-01-2014, 04:35 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Belle - 29-01-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Hopmatty - 01-02-2014, 10:09 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - faultythinking - 02-02-2014, 12:04 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - squashst - 02-02-2014, 09:01 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - OakR - 02-02-2014, 08:53 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - ontheedge - 02-02-2014, 11:07 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - lacb - 03-02-2014, 11:38 AM
RE: Traffic diversion - philip - 03-02-2014, 12:29 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - lacb - 03-02-2014, 12:58 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - P1971 - 03-02-2014, 05:02 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 03-02-2014, 05:24 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Baboonery - 03-02-2014, 06:34 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Iain - 03-02-2014, 07:03 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - shzl400 - 04-02-2014, 09:32 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Mr_Numbers - 04-02-2014, 11:14 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Applespider - 04-02-2014, 11:49 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 02-03-2014, 09:24 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - hoona - 02-03-2014, 10:59 PM
RE: Traffic diversion - Theotherbrian - 03-03-2014, 09:34 PM