SE23.com - The Official Forum for Forest Hill & Honor Oak, London SE23
Online since 2002   11,000+ members   72,000+ posts

Home | SE23 Topics | Businesses & Services | Wider Topics | Offered/Wanted/Lost/Found | About SE23.com | Advertising | Contact | |
 Armstrong & Co Solicitors



Topic Closed  Post Topic 
Pages (4): « First < Previous 1 [2] 3 4 Next > Last »
Land on corner of Perry Vale & Westbourne Drive
Author Message
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #21
12-06-2008 04:09 PM

I have checked with a neighbour of 91 , who has lived locally all his life. He insists that in his memory there has never been a building on that garden. He suspects it was part of the garden of The Swiss Cottages.
Surely in that case NO planning permission for any dwelling should be granted. A stand has to be taken

Find all posts by this user
Perryman


Posts: 820
Joined: Dec 2006
Post: #22
13-06-2008 12:23 AM

The map of 1874, shows this plot as part of one of the 2 gardens belonging to the last house on Westbourne Drive. (Fairly likely to be the same house as standing now.)

There is a driveway leading to the back of this house from Perry Vale, and this was sold off shortly after, as the map of 1875 shows that a little terrace cottage and garden strip had been developed on the drive. (This is fairly likely to be the same terrace cottage next to the empty plot now.)

The map of 1914 shows a separate empty plot as is today.
I've nothing to hand from that point on - something may have been built then flattened in the war, but your neighbour thinks this is not the case.

So it is more than possible that planning permission has been turned down for this empty plot for a hundred years.

Find all posts by this user
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #23
13-06-2008 10:44 AM

Thanks for the interesting info.
Maybe a swine herdsman had a hovel there in 1340's then he died in Black Death and no one else has ever lived there. It would be intesting if a Councillor could comment on this matter please. I must assume the person paying GBP 250k for the land must have the nod from the council to build. Surely if no house ever there should NOT be permitted.
If we say it was a plague pit then they would have to have major investigations.

Find all posts by this user
stefan


Posts: 93
Joined: May 2008
Post: #24
13-06-2008 12:08 PM

I am living down Perry Vale and have to say that in my opinion this plot seems perfect for a development either a single house or flats, I do not understand wht everyone is out to block any new developments in the area, we do not have enough flats in London and I am very lucky to finally buy in the area, so bring on new developments and keep the house prices down, so more people have chance to buy

Find all posts by this user
Perryman


Posts: 820
Joined: Dec 2006
Post: #25
13-06-2008 12:32 PM

Everyone knows the local plague pit was on Horniman's triangle, and not in Perry Vale, thank you very much. (Not that there is any evidence.)

As long as the new building(s) blend in with the Gothic cottages on the bend, then I have no objection. I'm no expert, but the house someone recently built on the other side of listed cottages on Perry Vale looks fine to me.

It aint necessarily bad news, but realistically, yes, there is every reason to be very afraid.

Find all posts by this user
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #26
13-06-2008 12:48 PM

Stefan
I apprecate your comments. People do need to live somewhere but not all in SE 23. I believe there are more people here than ever before.
What makes SE 23 pleasant to live in is the green spaces and the nooks and crannies.
We could build over every space without a building and double the population. How would Thames Water , EDF , The Roads and Southern Railway cope with that.
While a single house may not be a total disaster please not a multiple dwelling.

Find all posts by this user
blushingsnail


Posts: 371
Joined: Dec 2005
Post: #27
13-06-2008 01:18 PM

Stefan: the problem with that plot of land is its relationship to the neighbouring buildings. They're far back from the road and the last house in Westbourne Drive has windows on the side: any new building would block these windows and block the light to the small cottage on Perry Vale. Also, there used to be something called a 'building line' which meant that a new building couldn't be closer to the pavement than the neighbouring buildings. I don't think this is adhered to any more (or at least not strictly) but if you look at the plot you'll see that it would be impossible to build something in line with either of the end buildings on Perry Vale or Westbourne Drive. If something were built that was an acceptable distance from the neighbouring houses, it would almost be up to the pavement and that would be out of character with nearby properties.

There's also the issue of the two dolls' house cottages being listed buildings: a new development shouldn't detract from their appearance (which probably explains why the newish house between the cottages and the school playground was built in a similar style to the cottages).

Looking through Lewisham's planning website there have been a number of planning applications for this site over the years, all rejected. The last one was for a one-storey house and even that was rejected.

(I should note that I have no professional experience in these matters and I'm just basing my thoughts on informed common sense. So don't be surprised if I'm talking complete rubbish and Lewisham gives the go-ahead for a 4 storey block of flats!)

Find all posts by this user
AMFM


Posts: 306
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #28
13-06-2008 01:23 PM

Has anyone considered the possibility that it might just work out cheaper to buy the plot for ?250k and build a house on it than it is to just buy a house in the area?

No application has been made so none of us knows what the plan is for the plot. How can you possibly object when you don't even know to what you are objecting!?

Find all posts by this user
stefan


Posts: 93
Joined: May 2008
Post: #29
13-06-2008 02:06 PM

Thank you all for responding, I wrote this comment mainly on the basis that everyone seemed to object before there are any plans of what the plot may become, I do not agree to block any light or windows of other houses close by but I do believe there are options for a development to please everyone, I do love that "Swiss Cottage" next to the plot and I am sure something can be developed to fit in with the character of the surrounding area

Find all posts by this user
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #30
13-06-2008 02:16 PM

Amfm
If they are planning to build just one house the according to the previous note the council turned down planning permission for single house before.
Something fishy here. If the likehood , based on past experience , is that any application will be turned down then why buy . GBP 260k is quite a lot of money in my book.
I am convinced council must have given impression that application will be passed this time.

Find all posts by this user
AMFM


Posts: 306
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #31
13-06-2008 02:25 PM

I don't know the history of the planning applications on this site so i'm not going to make any comment on them but just because one application for a single house was turned down previoulsy does not mean that a more sympathetic, well thought out plan might not succeed.

And I am not denying that ?260k is a lot of money, simply that put into context, it is conceivably cheaper to buy the plot and build than to buy an existing house in the area.

Find all posts by this user
Rin


Posts: 15
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #32
18-03-2009 10:26 PM

Giving this a bump, and letting you all know that I've been in touch with Capital Growth re this property.
I'll keep you posted if anything comes of it.

Find all posts by this user
Rin


Posts: 15
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #33
18-03-2009 10:34 PM

Sorry, that was my very first attempt at hyperlinking and I'm a little inept. Try this...

Find all posts by this user
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #34
19-03-2009 11:48 AM

Excuse my ignorance Rin but if you are going to turn it into a market garden you have my total backing

Find all posts by this user
JonJon


Posts: 14
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #35
02-06-2009 07:10 PM

I noticed a new auction sign went up here today. Here's the link to the auction site http://www.skbauctions.co.uk/onlinecat_23-06-09.html, number 047.

It's reserve is ?195 so i guess the buyers didn't realise how restricted they were on what they could build there and are writing off up to ?65k to experience.

Find all posts by this user
PVP


Posts: 271
Joined: Mar 2005
Post: #36
03-06-2009 08:59 AM

?195 thousand.....

I quote, "Suitable for a variety of uses (subject to obtaining all necessary consents)"

Variety of uses meaning fly-tip?

Find all posts by this user
blushingsnail


Posts: 371
Joined: Dec 2005
Post: #37
30-07-2009 09:47 AM

According to the auction website the plot of land sold for ?200k.

Find all posts by this user
IWereAbsolutelyFuming


Posts: 531
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #38
30-07-2009 12:14 PM

Good. Let's hope the buyer has good plans for the site and it can be tidied up and put to good use. I'm sure we'll all be very supportive...

Find all posts by this user
brian


Posts: 2,002
Joined: Apr 2005
Post: #39
30-07-2009 02:40 PM

This is baffling why would anyone pay that ammount unless they believed they could get planning permission . Are we sure that LBC will give under pressure

Find all posts by this user
IWereAbsolutelyFuming


Posts: 531
Joined: Oct 2007
Post: #40
30-07-2009 06:07 PM

I know the planning history of this plot is a little unclear and that a few planning applications have been turned down but I'd have thought a single dwelling of an appropriate nature would get permission in what is a residential area.

Maybe they want to stick one of these on there:

http://www.ecohab.co.uk/

Find all posts by this user

Friends of Blythe Hill Fields


Possibly Related Topics ...
Topic: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Perry Vale Ward - low water pressure? SEN 2 3,978 23-11-2018 05:02 PM
Last Post: BigED
  Perry Vale Assembly Wed 7th November 2018 7pm hillview 0 3,216 06-11-2018 11:50 AM
Last Post: hillview
  Proposed Conservation Area: Perry Vale ‘Christmas’ houses and further north blushingsnail 2 4,573 25-10-2018 05:13 PM
Last Post: StuartG
  66-room hotel planned for All Inn One site, Perry Vale admin 5 7,427 11-10-2018 08:39 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Crash on crossing by Perry Vale Snazy 0 3,823 13-06-2018 10:22 AM
Last Post: Snazy
  Perry Vale, armed police stop last night Snazy 0 3,591 13-06-2018 10:19 AM
Last Post: Snazy
  Petition: Pedestrian Crossing on Perry Vale by Forest Hill station BigED 7 9,082 03-06-2018 11:41 AM
Last Post: michael
  Perry Vale Ward Assembly - 6 June 2018 michael 0 3,473 03-06-2018 09:02 AM
Last Post: michael
  Police community roadwatch session on Perry Vale hillview 0 3,224 01-06-2017 10:36 AM
Last Post: hillview
  Perry Vale One Way System michael 3 5,941 30-11-2016 10:12 AM
Last Post: wynell
  Perry vale hole Erekose 20 18,579 30-11-2016 05:46 AM
Last Post: Erekose
  Zebra crossing on Perry Vale! blushingsnail 3 5,978 23-11-2016 10:15 AM
Last Post: wynell
  Do we need a pedestrian crossing on Perry Vale at the rear of Forest Hill station? hertburs 113 97,710 16-11-2016 07:51 AM
Last Post: hertburs
  New planters on Perry Vale Foxtrot 5 7,823 04-07-2016 10:52 AM
Last Post: Mr_Numbers
  Ramp between Perry Vale and Dartmouth Rd Fsteele 14 13,561 20-05-2016 02:49 PM
Last Post: Perryman
  Parking Tickets being issued in Perry Vale car park when paying via RingGo rshdunlop 23 21,788 08-04-2016 12:35 PM
Last Post: Londondrz
  History of houses in Perry Vale triangle? Jane2 3 6,688 24-02-2016 08:53 PM
Last Post: Perryman
  Abuse at forest hill station Perry vale side Laurab82 20 21,220 13-11-2015 02:35 PM
Last Post: Snazy
  Perry Vale Local Assembly Tues 6th October, 7.00 Tim Lund 0 3,926 04-10-2015 09:37 PM
Last Post: Tim Lund
  Another accident on Perry Vale appetite4 35 31,792 25-09-2015 11:15 AM
Last Post: Perryman