David, your response doesnt make clear why the TLRA continued its active support in respect of opposing the covenant modification in the light of considerable neighbourhood disquiet about what was going on. I would have thought it would have been the fair and reasonable thing not to have proceeded with this rustling up of support against Piplings and scaremongering until the meeting had taken place. So far it does not appear that the TLRA has had a clear mandate to take this action, in fact exactly the opposite position is suggested.

Its clear to me and perhaps to others that these are delaying tactics using every available excuse to delay the meeting until the key actions in respect of the covenant have been put into place. Once that is done the position and the arguments of Piplings supporters has been weakened. Not decimated completely, just weakened.If you think this isnt transparent to many of us then you must think people are stupid. But then thats probably the case anyway.

I have known TLRA meetings to be arranged at considerable haste when a planning application needs opposing. Clearly not in this case.