No need to wait too long for @SE23_chris (aka @chrisbeach) to spill out retaliatory and abject views as evidence of his proclivity to go low.

It has been commented on in other places that Mr Beach can never go high - it's so much easier for him to go low.



Mr Beach has history. How many recall the hounding of another chosen victim who was in the midst of a real mental health crisis, a few years back?

Chris felt justified in publicising it in a relentless effort to silence the voice of his target and with whom he had a dispute.

On this occasion Mr Beach does not clearly identify who is being targeted.

However, is it possible that the style of the @SE23_Chris (aka @chrisbeach) tweet and this shame-laden gas-lighting is obvious to many?

There is a familiar and repetitive pattern of Denigrate. Divide. Repeat.

And repeat as often as can be gotten away-with as long as no-one calls out the behaviour.

Who can Mr Beach mean in this most recent round of repetitious and discreditable activity?

Therefore unsure whether this fits in the category of "Feedback" or "Retaliation".

This post was last modified: 09-09-2020 09:30 PM by jgdoherty.