As it had gone quiet I thought that the meeting was progressing but clearly not. Having read the letter I think it's outrageous that the Tlra chooses to proceed to openly solicit opposition and support for legal action whilst ignoring the requests of its members for an opportunity to discuss the issue. Have they not acknowledged at all the meeting request, and suggested they are looking to set a date and find a venue, or are their energies just going back into fuelling this particular fire?
if I were a member who felt ignored I think I would start looking into calling a meeting myself. Is that not possible under your constitution.?

I think it's clear now that the leadership of TLRA have selected which particular interests of particular members they have chosen to fight for whilst they choose to ignore others. This does not seem very balanced or democratic to
Me. Surely they have a mandate to operate in a reasoned and balanced fashion and to represent the views and interests of all members not just pick and choose in accordance with their personal preference. I have been on other bodies which purports to represent the 'community'' whereas in fact people use it to protect their own property interests. I think that's inevitable to an extent as its human nature but as this is a closed membership then there are surely clear mechanisms in place for canvassing opinion?