Revisiting the plans and the comments made in the other posts I agree that the design is interesting.

The contrast between the modern tower and the two storey frontage on Hindley's Place, which looks a bit like a Victorian barracks, provides a dynamic tension if that doesn't sound too pompous.

If you take the contrast away and I would suggest that there is nothing particularly original about the design of the tower or the Hindley's Place frontage. Perhaps this is a rather grand comparison but it reminds me of the glass pyramid built at the Louvre. An unexceptional modern design given weight by its context.

Perhaps I take an overly purist view in believing that the the design is more art than architecture.

Ignoring issues of design merit (which ultimately are purely subjective) I welcome the variety that the design would bring to the existing architecture of Hindsley's Place and Westbourne Drive.

The modern buildings in Westbourne Drive on either side of the proposed new build are best described as being Wickesesque. Bargain basement DIY styling with no attempt to lift the soul.

However, much as I deplore these modern buildings they are homes to fellow Forest Hillers and if I lived in the adjoining houses I would find the tower intrusive and overly dominant. It will also cast a very long shadow no matter what the light study says.

I would also criticise the ground storey treatment of the tower on Westbourne Drive. It projects significantly beyond the existing building line and the entrance area is fenced in a "get off my land" sort of way.

It is a great shame that the parking area between the tower and 12 Westbourne Drive doesn't appear to be available to build upon. Using that space would allow the height of the tower to be reduced and the building line maintained.

At the end of the day I wish Jeff good luck. It is good to see something other than the standard developer box with a pitched roof and as such should be welcomed. If the neighbours agree then everyone will be happy.